All Recent
pantojad -
I'm curious why other Oakley Crush has O logo on the number 6 but others doesn't have, is that normal? -mvp21

I believe the only ones with the o logo on the 6 are the skull ones and they did it because they did not want to impede or intrude on the skull logo. I have 3 of these now and hope to collect them all. this is personally one of my favorite original watches.
mvp21 -
I'm curious why other Oakley Crush has O logo on the number 6 but others doesn't have, is that normal?
Kevster -
Bought this watch back in 2001. Always receive a compliment when wearing it. When I first bought it I was bummed because it scratched so easily (especially the face). But now 6 years later it looks good with all the scratches that it has acquired. Band recently broke. Had Oakley replace the band and put in a new battery since the old one was probably about to go. A little bummed that the new band is thinner in width. Looks like a crush 2.0 band. I like the look of the original crush as opposed to the 2.0. Great watch. Def an Oakley fan.
ball5out -
frame:stealth black
face:stealth black
looks elegant and goes with anything u wear. it could be rugged or decent u'll still get to match it easily
o-static -
Frame: Stainless
Face: Stainless

nice durable, one complain, the back of the watch broke. was used each day for 4 years since it's release. can take a beating
only problem is you don't get a new band. so if it breaks your on your own, i ask oakley about it but still nothing...
bong -
Frame: Stainless Steel
Face: Yellow

as much as i love the Crush series with it's aggressive curves and unique design, the yellow dial face looks a bit too flat... the look would definitely improve if it was a cannon yellow like the Timebomb, with the little black dots to alleviate the expanse of flat yellow colour. however, the yellow does stand out from a distance, so this watch is still an attention grabber.
bong -
Frame: Stainless Steel
Face: Black Dial w/Red Skull

yeah... this watch has got attitude! everything i said about my Stainless Steel Dial is still true, and then some. highly sculpted metal, the cool shape of the Unobtanium band, like Splatter says, it looks fast standing still. when i was at the Las Vegas Vault, i had a choice of the Red Skull or the Silver Skull, and went for the red in a heartbeat. there's something so cool about a red and black combo, and the Red Skull looks great. love it!
yelkao -
Frame: Stainless Steel
Face: Red

I first bought the D1, but I really wanted something more. Something a little over the top with maybe a steel or metal case. Then the Crush was released and I practically got one without hesitation. The design is very unique from the case of the watch to the band. It's also very comfortable and one of the more reasonably priced watches Oakley offers. A personal favorite.
splatter -
Heavy and it scratches easily but is easy enough to afford and is the watch equivalent of a crotch rocket motorcycle
cool and fast standing still
fin7 -
Stainless Steel/Black Dial w/Red Skull

Great design again, great colour scheme. very desireable
Bought for my son at christmas, He jumped up and down for a good 5 minutes with joy.
His school friends were all very envious.
so much so, one of them stole it!
OakleyMonster -
This is my first Oakley watch. This one definitely looks better than the 2.0, in my opinion. People look at this watch and are instantly intrigued at its band's shape and the sculptural case. The watch is comfortable to wear, but also rugged. I've had mine for a few years now, and it shows little signs of wear. As my only Oakley watch, and as a person who always wears a watch, I have worn it frequently and it has stood the test. The only problem I have had is the part that the excess band fits into has broke, but I have been very rough with that part of the watch. I can't wait to get another!
bong -
Frame: Stainless
Face: Stainless

my first Oakley watch... i actually like the watch face on this Crush instead of the Crush 2.0. this one has a nice, sculpted O icon on the face whereas the 2.0 looks like a flat decal. the hands and the hour marks also looks better than the 2.0, this one definitely looks more aggresive. another thing i like this more than the 2.0 is a recessed crystal instead of a flush mounted crystal; it's less prone to scratching. i also love the integrated crown, whereas the 2.0's just look like chrome accents. the Crush is quite thick though, but it's confortable to wear, with the precurved watch band.
oogie -
Frame: Stainless
Face: Stainless

A great watch for a reasonable price. I love the watch face and the marks for the hours. Great design. I will say, however, I think they improved on the Crush 2.0 since it has a thinner casing and some extra design flare. The band is "fine" ... it's no Time Bomb or GMT band that will gather compliments. But a great, solid watch worth plenty of love and admiration.
kingphilbert -
Frame: Stainless
Face: Blue

For those who could afford the Time bomb, more power to you. This is what I went with an I love it. I wish I could have had the Bullet though. It's comfortable and tells time great. Heavy though and my Unobtainium band has not worn out. Not even that large, but thicker that most watches.

Now if they would release something like the GMT on a leather cuff band, that would be my next move.
Felipe N. Fumeni -
I have one of these ... are really quite different from other Crush. Everyone notices and asks: Where did you get that?
pepper -
My first Oakley watch from several years back and I still love it. Very unique and classy.
O-Review Logo & Design
© 2004-2024 Atom Crown Design and DCJ Productions.
Product Images, Logos and Artwork © 1975-2024 Oakley Inc.
All personal photos © 2004-2024 by their owners...or Rick.