So sorry I don't get to come often. o-review is seriously addicting, so I find myself not working for hours every time I visit. :o)
Tick, I also heard about the Frogskin comeback during the hq visit. I hope Oakley would offer replacement lenses for them.
Rob, thanks for the purchase and review. Due to x-metal frame variations, our custom lenses are usually designed and cut to fit the smallest of the frames, yet still not shake around in the larger ones. Even so, we still have too tight issues with some customer frames, and very few but some loose lens issues. We always try to include (with in-house custom lenses) a small piece of double stick foam that can be cut into a 1 mm thick strip and inserted into the track to cure the shake. Recent Custom Eyewear stuff from Oakley commonly have the shaky lens Juliet problem.
Justin, Our in-house produced lenses have the quality and clarity of optical grade polycarbonate. Meaning, if you went to your optometrist/optical-shop and got an Rx glasses with polycarbonate upgrade for thinner, lighter, UV protection, scratch resistance, and impact resistance, you would end up with same quality as our lens. These are not some cheap 7/11 sunglass lenses made of acrylic. Of course, scratch resistance on the front surface is much reduced after the mirror coating, as mirror coating is always more scratch prone than the hard coating on polycarbonates. Tint in the lens is part of the material like Oakley lens, so it won't fade over time like dyed sun lenses that most Rx sunglass lenses are.
Currently, we use 2mm thick lenses, which are slightly thicker than most Oakley lenses, but we plan to reduce the thickness. It's not easy to find pre-tinted high base curve polycarbonate lens in the US under 2mm.
As far as optical clarity, we are always trying our best to improve. Technically, Oakley's HDO is probably still better, although most people couldn't tell the difference. Oakley even claims their lens is better than Maui Jim's, but most of our customers prefer Maui Jim's lens (including myself) as clarity difference is very difficult to detect, but feature difference is very noticible. Most of Maui Jim's sunglasses come with polycarbonate, polarized (laminated, instead of Oakley's fused polarization), back-side anti-reflective coating, bi-gradient mirror, and are rimless (reduced internal stress, which causes slight optical distortion). Of these, two features make the greatest difference: polarization & back-side anti-reflective coating. Oakley has a few lenses, including, grey polarized, that has polarization and back-side anti-reflective coating, but most lenses you and I have on our Oakleys don't have these (both) features, as they are expensive features. I'm not putting down Oakley lens, as I do believe they are great, but I just don't have any customers that say "Wow, now I know why people pay more than $10 for sunglasses" about Oakley lenses, as the difference is less obvious. I do hear that all the time about Maui Jim & RayBan's G15 polarized with backside anti-reflective coating. Polarized G15 (kinda greenish - like Oakley's dark grey) is my personal favorate & I have a custom Square Wire 2.0 Light frame with those lens that I wear for driving. (trader, yes, i know) Yes, I do talk too much, but what can I say, I'm very passionate about what I do. As far as looks, innovation, non-slipness, durability, and cool lens, Oakley knocks the socks off everyone else.
Dorian, Sean, & Yukio, Yes, we have been working hard (approaching 2.5 years now) on Ruby Quartz replica, but sad to say that it's still a way off. I used to complain so much about Oakley's Ruby and +Red variations and why they couldn't just make the Ruby like the movie and make everyone happy. Well, now I'm very humbled and don't complain anymore. I don't know whether I would ever make the money back from all the investments for Ruby Quartz. We were going to call them Ruby Quartz Plus (plus, meaning that you could actually wear them, not just display them for show or pictures), but I'm really not sure if it'll happen anytime soon.
+Red looks pretty good, but it usually takes going through several sets of lens to get the color right, and that's very costly. Also, we get so many +Red defects from Oakley, and when you have to charge so much for lens, not even the slightest blemish is acceptable.
Bok & Donny, We can only cut lenses that make business sense as we are a business, and only frames that have been around for a long time has demand for replacement lenses. Pup is sorta out of questions for some time. G26, is not only very difficult to obtain, it's a color variation nightmare. It's so costly and time consuming, we can pretty much only justify for them for the Juliet & Penny, if they sell high.
Chester, Very sorry, we no longer take walk-in customers, and we also don't make one-offs or cut customer's lens. Too much liability to cut customer's lens. The last time I did that was to cut Cal's Ruby Clear into his X-Metal XX. That's a sweet lens. :o)
I wonder if anyone's even going to read all this. I just talk too much & this is why I have to try to stay away, so I can get some work done. I'm just really glad for o-review as some of the members inspired us and helped us. It was Lee Silver that introduced me to o-review, and I'm very grateful. See you all next time.