It doesn't seem too controversial to me. Tests like that conducted by the same company purporting to be superior generally tend to be a little skewed in their favour. I don't totally buy the "Laser Lens" test that Oakley puts on either, though I have no doubt their lens is optically superior. It's just good marketing really, and I take it only as such.
Oak, I understand and agree with your reponse but have found that whenever a comment is made whish is in any way "anti O" the offended replies usually come fast and furious (Did you get the racing tie in there, I thought it was a good one, hmmm, hmmmmmm?
look pretty much the same in the video. there are even spacers between the stands for the fabric sample and the torch to show you that they're the same distance. now, as for how much intensitey the torch has in the two tests, really no way to tell.
if Oakley paid for the test though, odds are it's skewed
I know there are all sorts of things like the angle the flame is pointing at, the fuel used etceteras but the length of the flame looked markedly longer.
Ho hum..... not to worry.
Hey Chad, did you just recently stumble into the world of animation. Your certainly getting a lot of mileage out of them today;-)
Glasses
Goggles
Watches
Accessories
Alphabetical
Video Reviews
