1/1
 
 
Title
Topic
Date
Start
End
Count
Comment
U9Ly_KwaN
Zik Alikhan
Jun 3, 2006 4:08 PM
So... I was chatting with an eBayer last night and being in love with Ruby Juliets we ended up talking about this:
There was this story about a fireman who's juliets got lost in a house fire. during the cleanup the frames stayed intact. Oakley offered to give the guy a brand new pair, but he wanted to use the same frame because of what it went through, so Oakley replaced the lenses and rubber on the the frame and the damn thing looked brand new! It was amazing
Well they did have a big thing in the newspaper about the story, and then there was a subsequent story about shrapnal from a bomb hitting a soldier in the face and his Juliets stayed on and it saved his right eye. And no kidding the frame stayed perfect. You cant even try to scratch this frame.
How true are these stories and do u guys have links to these stories? Was it in the news? I know Dann was in the news ;)
BrianJ1888
Brian Johnson
Jun 3, 2006 6:12 PM
They're not as indestructible as some will claim. I've seen a few pairs that have snapped at various points, usually an earstem or an orbital. Mars seemed particularly prone to failure.

As for the firefighter: what was he doing wearing Juliets in a burning building? Firefighters wear masks and respirators when they go into burning buildings, not metal glasses that will burn their faces.
eyeyeye
Edwin
Jun 3, 2006 6:25 PM
So true!
U9Ly_KwaN
Zik Alikhan
Jun 3, 2006 6:42 PM
Read again Brian, the firefighter lost his Juliet.. didnt say he was wearing it :) Probably he dropped it off from his fireman outfit...

Edwin: U've read the news before??
eyeyeye
Edwin
Jun 3, 2006 9:04 PM
No, Zik, but why would a fire fighter bring his Juliets into a burning house? I find it hard to believe he came to his job (being a fire fighter) wearing his Juliets and thinking "I better keep these with me somewhere in my flame resistant suit when I have to fight a fire".
Common sence, that's all.
O-minous
Eshan W.
Jun 3, 2006 9:31 PM
Maybe he wanted to have them handy so he could put them on when he posed for photographs right after saving the landlords cat from the burning building?
U9Ly_KwaN
Zik Alikhan
Jun 3, 2006 10:19 PM
He's a fireman.. maybe he was in the middle of something and then duty calls so he decided to bring his expensive shade to avoid losing it if he left it anywhere... who knows (-_-)

And i was asking about the news.. not a debate! =p
nightice
Jun 3, 2006 10:38 PM
Their not indestructible, my 500-pound girlfriend sat on them one time and the lens popped out and the frame is now lopsided. Juliet’s may survive a bomb or a burning inferno but the no match for a 500-pound woman. They should put that on the box.
Medic
Nik Mattheus
Jun 3, 2006 10:38 PM
There is a story on oakley news (someone linked it in the oakley.com updates thread) that tells the story about the military guy and his oakleys. I would link it but I am at work. Hehehe :)
Nik
O
O O
Jun 3, 2006 11:28 PM
i would never wear metal framed ballistic eyewear in iraq,

and i know the lenses are ballistic but i dont think they are classified as ballistic with metal frames. personally, i wouldn't want to wear juliets on a convoy or anything else, M-frames i think would be the best ballistic protection.

i think metal frames on your face would be more dangerous anyway in case something were to happen, x metal is very hard and an explosion close by your face could push that frame in your skin or possible do more damage than a plastic or "O" matter frame

but there is no doubt that the lenses would protect
Jay_X_Bee
Jay Brandie
Jun 4, 2006 12:38 AM
I wore mine X metal XX in Afghanistan and Irak during the war on freedom. During my tours i even wore M-Frame's and Scars, To me it didn't make a difference if it was metal or plastic. If you got to go, go in style!
DarkJuliet
Jonathan Tung
Jun 4, 2006 1:16 AM
War ON Freedom or War For Freedom?

And yes, Juliets aren't indetructible. They're pretty solid so far as heat resistance goes.
Jay_X_Bee
Jay Brandie
Jun 4, 2006 1:19 AM
It's War ON Freedom. Remember 9/11?
BrianJ1888
Brian Johnson
Jun 4, 2006 1:56 AM
In the US, the terminology is different:
terrorists fight a "War on Freedom"
the US uses the term "War against/on Terrorism"
jumpman73
Jumpman23 Mamba Triple Ocho
Jun 4, 2006 2:28 AM
Those are pretty cool stories. Its funny though that considering a 500 lbs woman sitting on Juliets that the Juliets were completely crushed. That's the positive side of things.
Tick
sees you
Jun 4, 2006 9:40 AM
i think metal frames on your face would be more dangerous anyway in case something were to happen, x metal is very hard and an explosion close by your face could push that frame in your skin or possible do more damage than a plastic or "O" matter frame

but there is no doubt that the lenses would protect
I think if you close enough to an explosion to push the frame into your face, that would be the least of your worries.

Setting your Oakleys anywhere where there's even a chance a 500 pound woman would sit is just plain careless! that includes your...I can't even say it!
U9Ly_KwaN
Zik Alikhan
Jun 4, 2006 3:47 PM
Well, when the guy said that the Juliets stayed on the soldier's face and saved his right eye, I was thinking... 'But what about his life? Is he still alive?'
ford
Ford .
Jun 4, 2006 11:01 PM
This is the stupidest thread ever.
eyeyeye
Edwin
Jun 5, 2006 1:41 AM
I did hear about a Texas sherif getting shot at and the bullit reco..something off his Oakleys.
U9Ly_KwaN
Zik Alikhan
Jun 5, 2006 2:00 AM
So nobody actually heard/read about the 2 stories that I brought up.... But some other stories came up!! =)

Ford: Stupid is, stupid was Sir! =p
eyeyeye
Edwin
Jun 5, 2006 2:06 AM
Not me, but did I tell you about that sherif? ;-)
U9Ly_KwaN
Zik Alikhan
Jun 5, 2006 2:10 AM
What Sheriff?? hehehee...
eyeyeye
Edwin
Jun 5, 2006 2:11 AM
Nahh...that's another story!
banarno
Lee Silver
Jun 5, 2006 10:37 AM
This thread seems to have run its course.


Thread locked.
 
 
1/1
 
 

O-Review Logo & Design
© 2004-2024 Atom Crown Design and DCJ Productions.
Product Images, Logos and Artwork © 1975-2024 Oakley Inc.
All personal photos © 2004-2024 by their owners...or Rick.