3/3
 
 
Title
Topic
Date
Start
End
Count
Comment
NeptuneTQ
Neptune TQ
Sep 23, 2004 10:56 AM
I guess the size of the Penny's actually would fit my face better, but my flat nose makes them sit too low on my face. The Juliets fit me ok, though they do sit on my cheeks a little bit. Larger nosebombs would fix that, but alas, only to be found in Japan :P None of the O matters except the Minute fit me. It's really the raked back curve of most Oakley's that don't fit me. Good for you guys, but bad for us flatter faced asians :)

Neptune TQ (NeptuneTQ - 9/23/2004 2:55:26 AM)
------------------------------------------------------------
eddyc
Eddy C
Sep 23, 2004 4:19 PM
Alas, my Asian brethren, you share my pain of having a flat nose and being a sunglass fanatic. I suppose I'm lucky in that my face is on the smaller/narrower side, so the smaller frames actually fit.

Any of you have M-Frames? I wouldn't wear these for anything else but sports and eye protection, but the large, soft nosepiece is oh-so-comfy and pushes the lens farther away from your face as if your nose bridge was larger.

Ed Chiu (eddyc - 9/23/2004 8:19:25 AM)
------------------------------------------------------------
john
John H
Sep 23, 2004 5:40 PM
why 3.0's aren't raked back at all

John Heins (john - 9/23/2004 9:40:42 AM)
------------------------------------------------------------
3/3
 
 

O-Review Logo & Design
© 2004-2024 Atom Crown Design and DCJ Productions.
Product Images, Logos and Artwork © 1975-2024 Oakley Inc.
All personal photos © 2004-2024 by their owners...or Rick.