2/2
 
 
Title
Topic
Date
Start
End
Count
Comment
Rick
Rick (The Doctor) Fawcett
Aug 17, 2006 1:11 PM
How much is your collection worth?"
In a word; priceless.
Dann
Dann Thombs
Aug 17, 2006 6:01 PM
$11,022 total, $6,347 on glasses. Ouch,
DrChop
www.drchop shop.com
Aug 17, 2006 6:46 PM
that's a nice chunk of change...I would imagine the value to be around around double or a bit under???
johnnygoodbeer
Aug 17, 2006 9:13 PM
You have got 1 hell of a collection there dude..NICE 1..and like someone said before..
its all PRICELESS,
you cant put a price on love.!!
i will be spending that in the next few years when i move out of the UK and in to the states, as theres hardly any decent stores around here..not as many O stores or Vaults.!!
thats why i am moving..to be closer to O HQ.!!
bong
Wilson Ng
Aug 17, 2006 9:39 PM
y'know, i never did think about checking my collection listing, but the prices are there, let's see...

collection to date, $14,376 total. $6,428 on glasses and $4,686 on watches... holy crap!
O-Whores
Thread Killers
Aug 17, 2006 10:05 PM
Hey, let's all not forget! We may spend several hundreds or even several thousands on our eyewear. But saving our eyes from this...

is well worth the price, wouldn't you say?
Dann
Dann Thombs
Aug 17, 2006 10:12 PM
That's the new ruby.
Icon208
I Con
Aug 17, 2006 10:12 PM
I would say, "ew."
BrianJ1888
Brian Johnson
Aug 17, 2006 10:35 PM
I did a presentation a few weeks ago in my Professional Communication class about sunglasses. I used the same pic (got it from the Investors Presentation pdf). Very convincing.

On the topic: I spend a very healthy percentage of my "income" (I mean scholarships and loans) on Oakley stuff. And now I work at a sunglass store that givs me access to anything I want.
Icon208
I Con
Aug 17, 2006 10:54 PM
If it's photokeratitis, it's a burn on the cornea. Looks like some type of infection, though.
johnnygoodbeer
Aug 18, 2006 1:02 AM
just uploaded the above picture to my mobile fone, to show my friends who DONT wear Oakley sunglasses and are happy spending very little on a pair of sunglasses..brand names not writen as i dont want to do THEM a favour.!!
Freesh
OAKLEY JUGGERNAUT
Aug 18, 2006 9:53 AM
Don't wanna be a party pooper, but if you go in the members section COLLECTION, it automatically compiles the amount that has been spent by each of us on O products. Now if you,re not too lazy to take the time to list your collection as a good and faithful O-Reviewer, it'll display it automatically, hence proving that this, once again, is a useless thread.

The Forum is not the only part of this website !

Cheers.
Icon208
I Con
Aug 18, 2006 10:02 AM
It isn't useless. I'm not going to look at every member's collection page, sorry. I look at someone else's collection if somebody tells me I should or because I know there's good stuff in there.
O-Whores
Thread Killers
Aug 18, 2006 2:18 PM
Don't wanna be a party pooper, but if you go in the members section COLLECTION, it automatically compiles the amount that has been spent by each of us on O products. Now if you,re not too lazy to take the time to list your collection as a good and faithful O-Reviewer, it'll display it automatically, hence proving that this, once again, is a useless thread.
Sometimes it's not just a matter of laziness. Sometimes it comes down to available time and prioritizing.
We want to eventually have our O-Review Collection completely up-to-date, but our personal Excel spreadsheet is 1)more important to us, and 2)easier and far faster to update.

Sometimes, we get a new pair and just want to throw it into the online collection to show it off in the latest purchases thread. We'll then go back and complete the entry.

So even though Dawn and I can be pretty lazy at times, mostly this is a matter of "when can we finally collate all of the individual pieces that make up our collection inventory?"
brennan2x
I Brennan
Aug 18, 2006 3:22 PM
Another thought regarding the automatic total, is that perhaps not everyone wants to advertise the exact anount of money spent on their stuff. A majority of the members here don't.
(This could also be laziness too!)
Dann
Dann Thombs
Aug 18, 2006 3:57 PM
Plus if you don't keep track, it's hard to go back and figure it all out after the fact.
american image
science wrapped in art dealer
Aug 18, 2006 4:22 PM
and maybe , the misses at home doesn't have a clue , and the mister ( the o-review member ) doesn't want to fill her in......
johnnygoodbeer
Aug 18, 2006 4:55 PM
and maybe , the misses at home doesn't have a clue , and the mister ( the o-review member ) doesn't want to fill her in......
Good Point...but i would sell me body parts for some OAKLEY things..open to offers...lmao:)
(Besides my A££ that aint for sale :)
LEX7
EJ Man
Aug 18, 2006 5:04 PM
Dann and Bong, is that what you actually paid or what you would have paid if you bought all your stuff at retail?
Dann
Dann Thombs
Aug 18, 2006 5:06 PM
Retail is $17,389 and that's not including the older models that I don't know the retail for.
LEX7
EJ Man
Aug 18, 2006 5:10 PM
have you done the thing, of putting all the info in an Excel file and then having the two totals at the bottom, retail and then what you actually paid?
ive done it and it wonderful to see the huge difference.
brennan2x
I Brennan
Aug 18, 2006 5:19 PM
I don't even really want to know the actual total, it might make me sick....

As for the photo someone included in this thread earlier,Its definitely something someone got from countless hours on the O-Review!
hotguy6919
Aug 21, 2006 11:56 PM
id have to say a tie between o-xide and Rick. they are at the top of the food chain. i however fall at the lower region of the chain and subject myself to possible ridicule. but thats ok, when all these members with loads of money die ill take the throne. by then ill have every pair of oaks EVER made! my day will come mmmmwwwwhhhhahahahahah!
2/2
 
 

O-Review Logo & Design
© 2004-2024 Atom Crown Design and DCJ Productions.
Product Images, Logos and Artwork © 1975-2024 Oakley Inc.
All personal photos © 2004-2024 by their owners...or Rick.