hey..some members know how i am..german oakley fanatic engineering student.. ;)
i noticed that here are not really much threads about the mag switches (in comparison to the x_metals)..maybe because there are a hand full of little probs with this lovely glasses..(too strong frame,nearly impossible to change lenses :(..(correction?-->would be my dream)..lacquer...)
also i recognized that on the mag switch, are little differences: possible cause: production date?:
for example: i have got two of this glasses.one dark carbide-blk iridium and on ti copper-ice iridium (my first)..i determindes that on the ti-copper the lacquer has got a worsed_case level..2nd: on their lenses, there is an another "colour-playing" in comparison to another ice iridium lenses for example: the splice ice lenses are more "ice'y" (?)..my own has got a little gold/green/light blue touch...3rd and worsed: the closed bow's contact the frontely inside-sides of the frame and from time to time, there's no more ti-copper :(
my second mag switch..,the DarkCarbide_blk iridium one, is nearly perfect: the lacquer is more³ resistent! best new feature are the little magnesium buttons on the other side of the "o-logo" on baw's, who prevent that the baw contact the inside of the front-frame-part..(very nice)..third difference and very in german "decadent" and so oakley like is the signature of "magnesium" on the left lense (compare: ducati/polarized)...
who noticed another differences?
another last statement/little_question offtopic..how do would to qualify my english? :) ..i am suprised in front of your answers
i love the spring_hinges and the nosely part of the frame
i hope my other mag switch fans are enjoed about this post
so i love this glasses..it's the connection between the omatter and xmetals on a wundeful another level
greetings from rainy germany