I have two O related stories on this.
About 3 years ago I went to a huge department store and was browsing the watches and drooling over the £999 O Time Bomb. I then spotted a small Icon (£799) mistakenly priced as a D1 digital (£129). My little brain raced and raced and I seriously thought about buying it for my girlfriend (turned out she wouldnt have liked it anyway). With it being a womans watch (with a salmon face) I couldnt even wear it myself so I even resorted to wondering what a watch reseller would give me for it to fuel my O habit (needless to say this was in the days before the o-review or I would have flagged it up to you guys). In the end I opted for the moral option. I called up the stores reception and asked to be put through to the departmental manager. Told him I was a big O fan and that I had spotted a BIG mistake in the pricing of a watch. I told him that my honesty had served him well but that I had done myself out of a £670 profit) He thanked me profusely and sent me out £50 in vouchers with a very warm thanks and a welcome to shop in his store any time.
On the flipside we can cut to today when I walked into a branch of a national chain of opticians and spotted a Ti A wire (£199) priced up at £119. I noted a small scratch on the iridium but thought "what the hell". Just before they rang them up I noticed they were doing a boxing day promo where if you spend over £100 on shades you get an extra 10% off. The attendant rang them up at £119.
"Did you ask for the extra 10% off" I hear you all ask.
"Do bears crap in the woods" I reply. £107 all in. Both parties involved where quite happy when the transaction took place, no laws were broken!
However, my examples only deal with mis-pricing, not the inclusion of seperate items in a transaction unbeknowest to the selling party.
If Steve hadnt known about this site there may be a good chance that he would have assumed that such a high end product had a little something extra thrown in as standard.
On the other hand, he does know and therefor it could be argued that he has a moral obligation to take it back.
Speaking for myself, I would keep it on point of principle to act as compensation for the Montefrios:-)
They didnt check the pockets. You didnt steal it. You paid for the jacket including its contents, be they a removable hood, a removeable snow skirt or a removeable titanium money clip.
On balance I like Oogies solution best!