Family: Wire
Date: October 2001

Mass: 17g
Frame:
Lens:
Pale Amber
Leather Gold Iridium
$250
05-778
Slate
Black Iridium
$250
05-779


TitanC -
Frame: Pale Amber
Lens: Leather Gold Iridium

Fistly I bough one of these as a rare deal for $100 Bucks on ebay recently, but wish I didn't!. Here's why? These are so tiny that they make me like a space freak and retarted! But the quality is amazing! The leather gold lens is an amazing golden Mirror! The arms are a beat platinum color titanium metal. the pale amber orbitals is fine too! If you have a tiny littel face yes I'd recommend these for sure , very sharp. But defifinately not for big nogons!
BullyVW -
Frame: Pale Amber
Lens: Leather Gold Iridium

I picked these up for a friend while in Vegas. She loved them, but I gave her two choices...and she could only keep one. She kept the Yardstick 2.0. Either which way, the glasses are a little flimsy, but the style is classic. On the right face, they look the part and appear classy. On Phil...I can't seem them looking the part nor classy!
kingphilbert -
Frame: Slate
Lens: Black

This was a sad pair of Oakley's. My most hated pair. They were small and flimsy. The lens was tiny and the ear stems kept loosening at the bolt that held them to the O Matter frame. I had to use a pliers to keep tightening them on a daily basis. If I remember, they were titanium but still too thin for anything I would care to handle. Not for large heads and not even for smaller heads. They looked good, and that was about it. It makes me wonder about all the other Why frames and just makes me ask Why?
O-Review Logo & Design
© 2004-2024 Atom Crown Design and DCJ Productions.
Product Images, Logos and Artwork © 1975-2024 Oakley Inc.
All personal photos © 2004-2024 by their owners...or Rick.